Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0405 14
Original file (NR0405 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

Docket. No: 00405-14
14 March 2014

This is in reference to your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United

States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative

regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this

Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material. submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies. -

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire

‘record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient

to establish the existence of probable material error or

injustice.

You enlisted in ‘the Marine Corps Reserve and began a period of

active duty on 1 June 2004, Your record shows that you. were
released from the reserve component with an honorable

characterization of service on 21 March 2007. You were assigned
a waivable RE-3P (Failure to meet physical/medical standards)

reentry. code due to ‘being diagnosed by military medical
authorities.

The. Board, in its review. of your entixe record and application,

carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors present in
your case, however, the Board found those. factors insufficient

“to warrant any change in your reentry code. The Board found you

failed to complete your enlistment. due to your medical

_ condition. “Although you have presented current medical evidence
that you. ae not now suffer from a mental disorder this does not
show you were medically fit on 21 March 2002. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of. your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In.this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when, applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice. ‘

, &

Sincerely,

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3187 13

    Original file (NR3187 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0306 14

    Original file (NR0306 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. On 26 July 2013, you were separated from active duty with an honorable characterization of service, transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve, and assigned an RE-4B (assigned when there is a military or civil record of in-service illegal drug involvement and no further potential for service) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2133 14

    Original file (NR2133 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0458 14

    Original file (NR0458 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You submitted a request for a hardship discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8742 13

    Original file (NR8742 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0642 14

    Original file (NR0642 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2723 14

    Original file (NR2723 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Marines discharged by reason of a medical condition normally are assigned an RE-3P reentry code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0446 14

    Original file (NR0446 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0265 14

    Original file (NR0265 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. On 30 January 2009, you received NUP for failure to obey an order/regulation by operating a government vehicle while exceeding the speed limit. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the -existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01383-11

    Original file (01383-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2011. In thie regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.